Growth Equity Versus Private Equity

In mergers and acquisitions (M&A), not all investors are the same, even if the money is. Two of the most common and influential players in this space are growth equity and private equity firms. While the terms are sometimes used similarly, they represent distinct strategies, objectives, and risk profiles.

That’s why understanding the subtle differences between growth equity versus private equity is crucial for founders, investors, corporate executives, and M&A advisors alike.

Whether you’re preparing for an acquisition, seeking strategic funding, or exploring options for scaling a business, knowing where growth equity versus private equity fits into the picture can help you make better-informed decisions. In this guide, we’re diving deep into this key comparison with a look into their respective impacts on M&A transactions, risk and return profiles, and due diligence. We’ll also share critical guidance on determining which path best suits your needs.

Understanding Growth Equity and M&A

Growth equity, sometimes called growth capital, is a form of investment that sits at the intersection of venture capital and traditional buyout-focused private equity. Growth equity investors target companies that are past the early startup phase but still require capital to accelerate their expansion plans.

These businesses typically have proven revenue streams, a clear market fit, and strong growth potential, but may not yet be profitable. Rather than buying out the entire business, growth equity investors usually take a minority or significant minority stake. The goal is to fuel growth initiatives such as entering new markets, hiring executive leadership, enhancing technology infrastructure, or executing a strategic acquisition.

What generally makes growth equity appealing to entrepreneurs is the promise of partnership without loss of control. These investors bring not only capital but also industry expertise, networks, and strategic guidance. Still, founders usually retain operational control, allowing the original vision to remain intact while growth is accelerated.

Understanding Private Equity and M&A

Private equity encompasses a broader and more diverse class of investment strategies, but it is most commonly associated with leveraged buyouts (LBOs). In these scenarios, private equity firms acquire controlling interests in mature companies — often using a mix of equity and significant amounts of debt — to improve operational efficiency, increase profitability, and ultimately sell the company at a higher valuation.

Private equity investors target businesses that are more established, typically generating consistent cash flow, and often in need of operational restructuring or strategic repositioning. Once acquired, these firms take a very hands-on role, often replacing senior management and actively shaping company strategy and performance.

The emphasis for private equity investors is usually on cost-cutting, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) enhancement, and preparing the business for an exit through a secondary sale or IPO. Unlike growth equity, where value is created through revenue growth, private equity often focuses on margin improvement and financial engineering.

Key Differences in M&A: Growth Equity Versus Private Equity

When evaluating and developing M&A strategy, it’s essential to understand how the investment approach, philosophy, and goals differ between growth equity versus private equity. These two models diverge in how they structure deals, interact with management, and create long-term value. Misunderstanding these distinctions can lead to misaligned expectations, ineffective partnerships, and missed opportunities.

Let’s explore the fundamental differences that define how growth equity versus private equity operates in the M&A landscape:

1. Control and Ownership Structure

A major point of divergence between growth equity versus private equity is how much ownership and control investors seek in a deal.

• Growth equity investors usually take a minority or significant minority stake, typically ranging from 10% to 49%. This means the founders or existing shareholders retain majority control and continue to lead day-to-day operations. Investors in growth equity deals act more as strategic partners than owners. They often join the board and provide oversight, but their role is usually advisory rather than operational. The company culture and leadership style remain largely intact.
• Private equity firms, in contrast, typically seek to acquire a controlling interest — often 51% or more — through a leveraged buyout. This control allows them to implement sweeping changes across leadership, strategy, and structure. In many cases, new management is brought in or existing leadership is repositioned to align with the firm’s performance improvement goals. Control is a cornerstone of their ability to execute their investment thesis.

2. Stage of Company

The type of companies that attract growth equity versus private equity also differ significantly in terms of their lifecycle and business maturity.

• Growth equity focuses on high-potential companies that have moved past the early startup stage. These businesses typically have proven products, a reliable customer base, and growing revenues, often in the range of $10 million to $100 million. But they may not yet be profitable or may be reinvesting heavily in growth. These companies require capital not to survive, but to scale. They may be launching new products, entering new markets, or investing in infrastructure and talent.
• Private equity usually targets more mature and stable companies. These businesses generally have predictable cash flow, established operations, and a longer track record of profitability. Often, they are family-owned businesses seeking succession, corporate divisions being divested, or underperforming assets ripe for turnaround. While they may not be high-growth, they offer strong fundamentals that can be optimized for increased returns.

3. Use of Leverage

A defining characteristic in how deals are financed highlights another contrast between growth equity versus private equity.

• Growth equity transactions are generally equity-heavy and involve minimal to no debt. Investors provide capital directly to the company’s balance sheet to fund growth initiatives. This approach minimizes financial risk and allows the company to stay flexible and resilient during its expansion phase. The emphasis is on unlocking upside through strategic execution, rather than relying on financial engineering.
• Private equity deals often use significant leverage, meaning they borrow a substantial portion of the purchase price. This debt is typically placed on the company’s balance sheet and serviced with its future cash flows. The use of leverage amplifies returns if the company performs well, but also introduces higher financial risk. If cash flows decline or if the company underperforms, the burden of debt can severely impact operations or lead to default.

4. Investment Horizon and Exit Strategy

While both types of investors generally have a multi-year time horizon, the exit mechanisms and expectations can differ in subtle but important ways.

• Growth equity investors usually plan for an exit within four to seven years. Common exit routes include initial public offerings (IPOs), strategic acquisitions by larger industry players, or recapitalizations. Because they hold minority positions, exits often depend on timing alignment with founders or majority stakeholders. The exit process tends to be more collaborative and requires coordination among several parties.
• Private equity firms also target a similar holding period, but with greater control over the exit timing and method due to their majority ownership. They may exit through a secondary buyout, a sale to a strategic acquirer, or a dividend recapitalization prior to a full exit. Control enables them to dictate the pace and style of exit, often with a clear timeline baked into the original investment thesis.

5. Value Creation Strategy

The way in which each investor type aims to create value is central to the distinction between growth equity versus private equity.

• Growth equity investors create value by helping companies grow faster than they could on their own. This includes expanding into new markets, building out product lines, investing in go-to-market strategies, or acquiring smaller competitors. The focus is on topline revenue growth, capturing greater market share, and increasing market penetration. Investors often contribute industry expertise, strategic guidance, and high-level networking, but do not get involved in daily operations.
• Private equity firms tend to focus on operational efficiency and margin enhancement. Their strategies might include streamlining costs, renegotiating vendor contracts, consolidating business units, or improving pricing strategies. Because they own the company outright or have majority control, they can implement more aggressive operational changes. Financial engineering and leverage also play a key role in boosting return on equity.

While both growth equity and private equity are powerful tools in the M&A arsenal, they approach investment from fundamentally different angles. Growth equity is about partnering with promising companies to accelerate their ascent, often with minimal disruption. Private equity, by contrast, is about acquiring control to restructure, optimize, and eventually exit with higher enterprise value.

Understanding these distinctions is crucial when evaluating potential deals, seeking investment, or planning an acquisition strategy. In the complex arena of M&A, clarity around the roles of growth equity versus private equity can guide stakeholders toward the most effective and aligned capital solutions.

Risk and Return: Balancing the Trade-Offs

In any investment strategy, risk and return go hand-in-hand. Understanding how these elements differ between growth equity versus private equity is essential for both founders and investors.

Growth Equity Risk Profile

Growth equity involves a moderate risk-return profile. Because companies are earlier in their lifecycle, they are more exposed to competitive pressures and execution risk. But since there is less leverage involved, the financial risk is comparatively lower. Investors bet on the company’s ability to grow revenue, gain market share, and scale operations effectively.

Private Equity Risk Profile

Private equity deals, while targeting more stable companies, often carry a higher financial risk due to leverage. If the company underperforms or economic conditions deteriorate, debt obligations can create serious challenges. That said, the returns can be substantial when the operational transformation is successful, especially given the amplifying effect of debt on equity returns.

Due Diligence Requirements

The due diligence processes in growth equity versus private equity also reflect the different risk factors and investment philosophies.

Growth Equity Due Diligence

Due diligence in growth equity focuses heavily on forward-looking metrics. Investors scrutinize:

• Market potential and size
• Product-market fit
• Customer acquisition costs and lifetime value
• Scalability of operations
• Strength and vision of the leadership team

Because these companies are in growth mode, past performance is less indicative of future success. Qualitative assessments of the market and team often carry significant weight.

Private Equity Due Diligence

In contrast, private equity due diligence is grounded in financial and operational rigor. Key focus areas include:

• Historical financial performance
• EBITDA trends and margin analysis
• Operational inefficiencies
• Debt servicing capacity
• Legal and compliance risks

Since control is being assumed, private equity firms often perform more intrusive and extensive assessments, including forensic accounting, management capability reviews, and vendor contract analyses.

Choosing Between Growth Equity and Private Equity in M&A

Determining whether growth equity versus private equity is right for a business depends on goals, stage, and comfort with relinquishing control. Here are a few guiding principles to help make the right decision:

Growth equity may be a better fit for the following situations:

• Companies that are growing but need capital to scale faster.
• Businesses that want to retain control and work collaboratively with investors.
• Companies focused on long-term market capture rather than short-term profitability.
• Companies that are less comfortable taking on debt to fund growth.

Private equity generally applies favorably in these scenarios:

• Owners who are ready to exit or transition out of the business.
• The company is mature and generating stable cash flow.
• There are operational inefficiencies that an outside investor can help fix.
• Companies are open to handing over control to seasoned operators or a new leadership team.

The choice between private equity or growth equity doesn’t have to be one or the other. In some cases, hybrid models are emerging where private equity firms offer growth capital while still taking majority stakes, or growth equity firms are becoming more flexible in their structures. But understanding the core differences between growth equity versus private equity is the first step to aligning your capital strategy with your business goals.

Navigating the Capital Spectrum

In today’s dynamic M&A landscape, both growth equity and private equity can offer compelling value. While growth equity is about acceleration and partnership, private equity is about transformation and control. Each has a unique place in the corporate lifecycle, and the best choice usually depends on specific and time-sensitive business needs.

For founders, executives, and stakeholders weighing their options, asking the right questions is key:

• Do you need strategic growth capital or a full exit?
• Are you looking for a collaborative partner or a hands-on operator?
• Are you prepared for dilution, or are you ready to step back?

When evaluating M&A opportunities, it is essential to align with the type of investor that best matches your vision. By understanding the trade-offs between growth equity versus private equity, you position your company to not only survive the transition but to thrive in its next chapter.

Whether you are navigating a high-growth journey or restructuring a legacy business, choosing the right capital partner is one of the most important decisions in the M&A process. From due diligence to post-merger integration, having capital aligned with the larger strategic goals of your organization is absolutely critical.

Comments